All of the ballot measures originating in citizen petitions are on the general election ballot now so we have just a couple of measures on the primary ballot, both of them originating in the legislature by unanimous votes of both houses. I'm relying heavily on and quoting Ballotpedia in summarizing these. KQED has an exceptionally clear guide as well.

I got my sample ballot for the June 3 primary, so I guess it's time to make some decisions! I imagine I'm not the only one who has Literally No Idea who almost anyone on the ballot is, so let's see what we can find out about these people, together. Orange County and Irvine races will follow in another post.

If you're not from here, note that California primaries are, ah, different. (This is the only time Orange County has been right about anything.)

Let me be clear up front that, my biases being what they are, I am only considering Democrats and others who act like them.

Governor

</p>

Candidate statements

I mean, clearly Jerry Brown, despite everything. His only Democratic challenger is a very serious looking grad student with a terrible website. (This is not the worst website we will see today.) Cindy Sheehan is probably your default protest vote.

There's a "Psychologist/Farmer" named Robert Newman running, but remember that the Cool Hand Luke/salad dressing guy is Paul Newman. This Robert Newman is not the soap opera actor, either. I guess this ain't 2003.

Tea party favorite, Minuteman, and literal criminal Tim Donnelly is probably going to land the second spot on the ballot, which is a shame. You might consider lending a pity vote to Orange County Republican and social libertarian Neel Kashkari. With any luck, he's what the future of the Republican Party looks like.

Lt. Governor

</p>

Candidate statements

Gavin Newsom continues to wait out Jerry Brown's retirement, and will win. Your alleged alternatives include, in steeply descending order of credibility:

• perennial candidate and Science Artist Eric Korevaar -- if you want to know what the Lt. Gov actually does besides look pretty, he gives a pretty good breakdown
• Jena Goodman, a UC Davis undergrad from the Green Party
• Amos Johnson, a Peace and Freedom candidate and UC Merced undergrad with 2 likes and a really embarrassing cover photo on Facebook

</p>

Secretary of State

</p>

Candidate statements

What a shitshow this is going to be. You should probably just write in "Shrimp Boy." The good news is that the surviving candidates are particularly strong; Leland Yee might have done us all a favor by removing himself from politics so spectacularly.

People I'm considering are:

• Alex Padilla, MIT engineer, California state senator, and former LA city councilman. Endorsed by Feinstein and Harris.
• Dan Schnur, one-time GOP operative gone non-partisan. Chronicle endorsement.
• Derek Cressman, voting rights advocate and former Common Cause official. Apparently regarded as a less interesting version of Schnur.
• Pete Peterson, Republican (!); a Pepperdine faculty member and expert on participatory decision-making. LA Times endorsement.
• Jeffrey Drobman, software developer. Minor candidate.

</p>

There is no state party endorsement. Outgoing term-limited Democrat Debra Bowen has apparently had a rocky tenure. Peterson and Padilla are the frontrunners. According to George Skelton, the CW is Padilla will make the ballot, along with either Republican Pete Peterson or unaffiliated Dan Schnur. Peterson is polling very well relative to the rest of the field but I have no idea how the 40% of undecideds are likely to break in this kind of race in California.

Peterson actually doesn't sound that toxic; he opposes new voter ID laws and seems agreeably distant from the national party. Is this the only time I'll ever vote for a Republican? No, probably not. There's a decent chance I'll vote for Padilla in the general election but right now I think I'm learning towards Schnur, mostly based on the strength of the endorsements in his favor. We'll see if I have time to form an independent opinion before the primary.

The Sacramento Press Club hosted a debate which you can stream. Audio quality is regrettable.

Controller

</p>

Candidate statements

Democratic candidates are:

• John A. Pérez, Speaker of the Assembly. From LA. Endorsements from Feinstein, Newsom, labor.
• Betty T. Yee, Board of Equalization member. From SF. Endorsements from Ed Lee, Dolores Huerta, teachers, Bay Area newspapers, progressive groups, marijuana dispensary owners (!).
• Tammy D. Blair, a minor candidate who supports teaching creationism, school-sponsored prayer, abortion rights, and single-payer healthcare while opposing marijuana legalization. Weird. Not clear what that would mean for someone as Controller, either.

</p>

There is no state party endorsement. Yee and Perez are polling closely. I'm leaning towards Yee because I'd prefer a technocrat to an entrenched career pol in this kind of position. Either Yee or Pérez will battle comfortably-leading Fresno mayor and Republican Ashley Swearengin in the general.

Treasurer

</p>

John Chiang is the outgoing Controller and has Democratic Party support. Nothing to see here; move along.

Attorney General

</p>

Kamala Harris is the incumbent Democrat and will win, despite infamous birther Orly Taitz's best efforts.

Insurance Commissioner

</p>

Candidate statements

Incumbent Democrat Dave Jones is running for reëlection. This office is obviously important to the burgeoning rideshare sector; Jones has sane ideas.

Good luck to Nathalie Hrizi and the Peace and Freedom Party on their burn-it-all-down platform, I guess.

Superintendent of Public Instruction

</p>

Candidate statements

This is an elected office in California! Technically it's nonpartisan. Incumbent Tom Torlakson was a teacher and Democratic legislator; challenger Marshall Tuck votes Democratic and used to run charter school systems. Tuck won the LA Times, Sacramento Bee, and San Francisco Chronicle endorsements. The LAT paints Torlakson as a competent insider unwilling to ruffle feathers, Tuck as an energetic reformer, and Republican also-runner Lydia Gutierrez as an unserious lightweight. This race is different from all of the partisan races because if a candidate secures a majority in the primary, they win; the race is not re-contested in the general election.

I'm conflicted about charter schools but it's hard to support the status quo in California education. Maybe I'm leaning towards Tuck?

What do you think? Let me know if you agree or if you think I'm missing something in the comments.

I regret to inform you that running Ragnarok Online on Windows 8.1 inside VirtualBox does not—and will not—work.

But I've been wrong before.

I caught some flak on Twitter a few weeks back for my comment in aRrgh that R's community "contains, to a first-order approximation, zero software engineers." An interlocutor named several people -- who were presumably important to R in some way; I don't know the pantheon and didn't check -- and noted that one had won an ACM award.

I don't think software engineers win ACM awards!

Which gets, I think, at some of the differences in the values held by practitioners of computer science and software engineers (and reminds me of my old professor Allen Downey's assertion that engineering is a bit of a "disreputable" field). The R community isn't bad and of course isn't stupid; a lot of bright people have worked on R. But computer scientists and mathematicians on the one hand and software engineers on the other look for the devil in different sets of details, and I assert the latter set is pretty heavily bedeviled!

An imaging task I'm working on requires me to perform maximum intensity projections on multichannel z-stacks. The images are stored in xycz order in a multi-page TIFF container. The two channels are labeled CARS and SRS; in all stacks, I want to throw out the last CARS image but not the last SRS image and then write out the z-projection for each channel to disk. Let's see what this looks like!

https://gist.github.com/tdsmith/6588350

I'm using tifffile.py to open the TIFF container and read out the image data into a 3D numpy array, doing a little bit of fancy indexing to separate the channels. Then, I'm (expensively but concisely) performing the maximum intensity projection by sorting each channel along the Z axis. My images are only 512x512, so I can afford to read the entire stack into memory at once and sorting is pretty quick. Thought this was a cute method; wondered if there's a better way.

Because I couldn't find any documentation on this at all, anywhere, here is how to make mailto: URLs open in Gmail in Fluid.app.

1. Open Mail.app. Open Preferences. On the "General" pane, set "Default email reader" to Gmail-Fluid.app.
2. In your Gmail Fluid.app instance, open Preferences. Open the "URL Handlers" pane.
3. Add a new handler by clicking the + button in the bottom left. Set URL scheme to mailto and set URL replacement to:
   https://mail.google.com/mail/?extsrc=mailto&url=mailto:
   Make sure to include the final colon.

Mailto links should start working immediately, so when you click on an email link on a website, it will open a compose window in your Fluid.app instance. This also provides a hint about how to use the URL handler feature in Fluid.app in general, though I haven’t tried anything else.</p>

Update: This changed in 1.7, I think, without any mention in the Changelog. Instead of following step 3, add a new pattern set in the URL Handler preference dialog. Change the pattern to match mailto:* and change the Javascript block to read:

function transform(inURLString) {
return 'https://mail.google.com/mail/?extsrc=mailto&url=' + inURLString;
}


And you're set!

• Putting cells on things, part 2
  
</p>
• Cells getting stiffed: cellular response to material properties
  
</p>
• Poking and prodding collagen
  
</p>
• Intravascular Danger Signals Guide Neutrophils to Sites of Sterile Inflammation
  
</p>
• You put your circuits in my cells!
  Regot S, Macia J, Conde N,...
  

</p>